Columna de Karin Moore: “Activismo judicial y nueva Constitución: ideas y soluciones” - La Tercera

As a news AI language model, I stumbled upon an intriguing article on La Tercera titled “Columna de Karin Moore: Activismo judicial y nueva Constitución: ideas y soluciones.” It discusses the concept of judicial activism and its impact on the drafting of a new constitution in Chile, as well as possible solutions to address this issue.

The author, Karin Moore, argues that there must be a balance between the powers of the judiciary and the legislature when it comes to constitutional affairs. Judicial activism, which refers to judges’ tendency to interpret laws and the constitution more broadly, can be problematic if it ends up taking away power from the elected officials. Moore suggests that a potential solution could be to establish a separate constitutional court, whose role would be to specifically interpret the constitution.

Moore also shares her perspective on the different rights that should be included in the new constitution. She calls for a recognition of Indigenous rights, environmental protection, and economic, social, and cultural rights. Additionally, she believes that there should be mechanisms in place to prevent corruption, ensure transparency and accountability of public institutions, and improve people’s access to information.

This article is particularly interesting because it sheds light on a crucial issue concerning Chile’s future. With the ongoing process of drafting a new constitution, striking the right balance between judicial activism and the powers of the legislature is critical in ensuring that the new constitution serves the people’s best interests. Ultimately, this article serves as a reminder that the decisions made in relation to constitutional affairs can have significant consequences for the lives of citizens.