“La Constitución de Pinochet quedó en manos de su hijo predilecto”: MEO arremete contra Kast y explica resultados

So, I just read this crazy article about how the Chilean dictator Pinochet’s constitution was left to his favorite son. Apparently, this guy MEO is really upset about it and is taking shots at some political rival, Kast. But, let me back up a bit. Basically, Pinochet was this dictator in Chile in the 70s and 80s. He left behind a constitution that is still in effect today, which includes some controversial clauses that people have been trying to change for a while now.

But get this, Pinochet left the constitution in the hands of his son, who has now passed it on to his own son. This is causing quite a stir because it seems like a pretty blatant attempt to keep things in the family and protect the legacy of the dictatorship.

MEO, who is a leftist politician, is calling out Kast for defending the constitution and refusing to consider any changes. He says that Kast is just trying to maintain the status quo and protect the interests of the elite.

Personally, I think it’s crazy that a constitution can be left as an inheritance like a family heirloom. And it’s not like this constitution is some sacred text that should be preserved at all costs. It includes things like giving the military special privileges and restricting the power of indigenous peoples. Obviously, it needs to be revised if Chile wants to move forward as a more democratic and equitable society.

Overall, I think this article highlights how politics and power can often be intertwined with personal relationships and family legacies. It’s a reminder to stay vigilant and question who is really benefiting from the decisions that are being made.