As a writer for a news site, I came across an interesting article titled “No hay datos entre 2018 y 2022”: ¿Por qué Cadem no realizó preguntas sobre delincuencia durante el Gobierno de Piñera?“. What caught my attention was the fact that Cadem, a Chilean public opinion research company, did not ask any questions about crime rates during President Piñera’s government.
According to the article, Cadem usually conducts surveys to gauge public opinion on a variety of topics, including crime. However, the company has not included crime-related questions in their surveys between 2018 and 2022, which covers Piñera’s presidency. This has led to speculation about why they didn’t ask about crime, especially since it’s a major concern for Chileans.
One possible explanation mentioned in the article is that Cadem may have wanted to avoid presenting data that could be interpreted as critical of the Piñera government. Crime rates have been a major concern for Chileans, and not addressing it in surveys could be seen as a way of downplaying the issue.
This article provides an interesting insight into how public opinion research companies operate and how they may be influenced by political factors. As society becomes more aware of the importance of data-driven decision-making, companies like Cadem play an increasingly significant role in shaping public discourse. It’s important to be aware of how these companies operate and the potential biases they may have.
In conclusion, while the reason behind Cadem’s lack of crime-related questions is still unclear, it highlights the need for transparency and accountability in public opinion research. By providing unbiased and reliable data, research companies like Cadem can help inform important policy decisions and ensure a better future for everyone.
Quick Links