Suprema confirma desafuero de doctora Cordero tras querella por injurias contra Fabiola Campillai

The Supreme Court of Chile has confirmed the removal of parliamentary immunity for Dr. Carmen Gloria Cordero, a member of the Chilean Congress. This decision comes after she was accused of making offensive remarks against Fabiola Campillai, a woman who lost her sight due to the actions of the police during the 2019 social uprising.

What caught my attention about this article is the important role that parliamentary immunity plays in the political landscape, and how it can sometimes shield politicians from facing legal consequences for their actions. This particular case raises questions about the boundaries of freedom of speech and the responsibility of lawmakers to maintain a respectful discourse.

In the article, it is stated that Dr. Cordero allegedly made injurious comments about Fabiola Campillai during a television program. Campillai, who lost her sight after being hit by a tear gas canister launched by the police, filed a lawsuit accusing Cordero of defamation. The removal of Dr. Cordero’s parliamentary immunity means that she can now be investigated and potentially face legal consequences for her alleged actions.

Parliamentary immunity is a legal protection that shields lawmakers from being prosecuted for their opinions or statements made while performing their legislative duties. It is intended to protect freedom of speech and prevent political persecution. However, it can sometimes be misused, allowing politicians to act with impunity.

The confirmation of the desafuero, or removal of immunity, in this case is significant because it demonstrates that politicians can still be held accountable for their words and actions. It sends a message that no one is above the law, regardless of their political stature.

This article sheds light on an important aspect of the legal system and the principle of accountability in politics. It highlights the need to strike a balance between freedom of speech and the responsibility to maintain a respectful and inclusive public discourse. Ultimately, the case of Dr. Carmen Gloria Cordero serves as a reminder that everyone, regardless of their position, should be mindful of the impact of their words and actions.