"Y la deuda en Hacienda": Shakira tiembla por segunda investigación por fraude fiscal

Shakira, the iconic Colombian singer, is facing a second investigation for alleged tax fraud. The singer, known for hits like “Hips Don’t Lie” and “Waka Waka,” is now under scrutiny by the Spanish tax authorities, raising concerns about her financial affairs.

What caught my attention in this article is the ongoing battle Shakira has been facing over her tax obligations. This isn’t the first time her name has been associated with tax evasion allegations, and now it seems that there is a second investigation by Hacienda, the Spanish tax agency.

According to the article, this new investigation is focused on Shakira’s tax payments between 2012 and 2014, during which time she claimed to be a non-resident of Spain. Spanish law requires individuals to pay taxes on worldwide income if they spend more than 183 days in the country. However, the prosecutors allege that Shakira was indeed a resident during those years and thus owes substantial back taxes.

This isn’t the only legal battle Shakira has faced regarding taxes. In 2019, she reached an agreement with Spanish authorities to settle a similar accusation related to the period between 2011 and 2014. In that case, she ultimately agreed to pay around €29 million ($35 million) in back taxes.

While it’s important to note that these are allegations, it does raise concerns regarding tax practices and the importance of individuals meeting their fiscal obligations. Tax evasion not only affects governments’ revenue but also undermines trust in the fairness of the system.

The situation involving Shakira also highlights the increased scrutiny that high-profile individuals face in financial matters. This could include detailed investigations into their residency status and income declarations.

In conclusion, Shakira finds herself in hot water once again as Spanish authorities launch a second investigation into her alleged tax evasion. The outcome of this case will likely have significant financial implications for the renowned singer. Ultimately, this serves as a reminder of the importance of complying with tax obligations and the potential consequences for failing to do so.